HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z620 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158A
Memory18.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191029
Uptime8 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '23 at 18:42
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 59.3
2-Core 160
58% 99.1 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 541
52% 428 Pts
64-Core 835
52% 835 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000
HP(103C 079C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 353.30
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Lighting 15
Reflection 18
Parallax 18
12% 17 fps
MRender 21.3
Gravity 14
Splatting 15
14% 16.8 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK256MBF-1AN1ZABHA 256GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M603
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 403
Write 369
Mixed 332
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 52.6
4K Mixed 27.9
95% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 235
190% 268 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 106%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
80GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 11,659
Mixed 109
4,209% 5,884 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GR7AFR4A-PB 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
47.1% Average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.5
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 9.5
30% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,426 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $345
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback