Toshiba SATELLITE C75-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C75-A  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130923
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '23 at 17:05
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 71.8
1-Core 77.6
2-Core 119
55% 89.4 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 189
25% 186 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 710M
Toshiba(1179 FA89) 1GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9125
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
3.4% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 1
3% 3.5 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 5
Splatting 4.4
4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.4%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-00000 256GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 116 53 49 44 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 462
Write 256
Mixed 177
SusWrite 80.2
54% 244 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 74.5
4K Mixed 28.1
123% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 73.8
106% 200 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 15.8
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 16
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 97.2
41% 97.2 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE C75-A Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C75-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback