Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9830P APU (2016 M.BR) 4,052 User benchmarks, average bench 40% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	27% Poor	Memory 32.8 1-Core 60.5 2-Core 114 38% 69 Pts	4-Core 120 8-Core 135 17% 128 Pts	64-Core 165 10% 165 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 37,078 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 14A0) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.2.2 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	3.18% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 4.9 Parallax 5.4 3% 4.73 fps	MRender 3.8 Gravity 4.8 Splatting 3.3 3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.18% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GB 4,377 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30100P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 121 108 131 126 134 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	52% Above average	Read 398 Write 131 Mixed 148 SusWrite 122 44% 200 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 33.9 4K Mixed 17.1 70% 23.6 MB/s	DQ Read 206 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 116 101% 152 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Micron 8ATF51264HZ-2G1B1 8GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2400, 2133 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	30.6% Below average	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 8.7 MC Mixed 13.6 33% 11.6 GB/s	SC Read 4.7 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 8 19% 6.63 GB/s	Latency 239 17% 239 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 69%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
FX-9830P APU (2016 M.BR)AMDBench 40%, 4,052 samples	39x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	38x
Radeon RX 460 GraphicsAMDBench 21%, 6 samples	1x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-2G1B1 1x8GBMicronBench 30%, 4,400 samples	10x
M471A1K43BB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 35%, 32,056 samples	8x
M471A1K43BB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 66%, 14,350 samples	4x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16