Semp STI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive17.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSemp STI  (all builds)
MotherboardSemp STI 012887
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20121126
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '23 at 13:16
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 51%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 80.7
1-Core 73.4
2-Core 156
61% 104 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 215
30% 219 Pts
64-Core 220
14% 220 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.9% Above average
Lighting 64
Reflection 85.7
Parallax 58.7
52% 69.5 fps
MRender 67.1
Gravity 69.5
Splatting 63.9
54% 66.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 240GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0211A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 125 202 205 49 6.5 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.9% Very poor
Read 147
Write 95.7
Mixed 6.2
SusWrite 101
19% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.3
22% 5.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 90%
Samsung HN-M320MBB 320GB
201GB free
Firmware: 2AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 72 74 74 76 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 65.2
Write 41.6
Mixed 37
SusWrite 74.5
40% 54.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TMT251U6FR8C-H9HC Kingston DDR3 1600 8G 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.2% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 12.2
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 12.2
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STI Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Semp STI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback