HP OMEN by HP Desktop 873-0xxx

Performance Results


Gaming 154% UFO	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 128% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	200% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

15 months ago, 15 months ago.

System	HP OMEN by HP Desktop 873-0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 86D2
Memory	8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20200528
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 25 '23 at 10:11
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700F-$279 54,980 User benchmarks, average bench 92% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	78.7% Very good	Memory 76.4 1-Core 135 2-Core 258 85% 156 Pts	4-Core 446 8-Core 578 65% 512 Pts	64-Core 610 38% 610 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% Asus(1043 882E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 528.49 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	200% Outstanding	Lighting 296 Reflection 263 Parallax 298 241% 286 fps	MRender 322 Gravity 241 Splatting 176 194% 246 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 200% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG-8310A 512GB 6,904 User benchmarks, average bench 131% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80002C00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 249 394 283 231 217 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 773 Write 600 Mixed 630 SusWrite 300 129% 576 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 63.3 4K Mixed 33.6 115% 40.8 MB/s	DQ Read 754 DQ Write 661 DQ Mixed 534 448% 649 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 182%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$46 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 588GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 179 181 162 184 189 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	76.2% Very good	Read 87.7 Write 114 Mixed 66.2 SusWrite 178 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 64% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$46 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 137 138 134 137 135 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	68.6% Good	Read 104 Write 150 Mixed 73.9 SusWrite 135 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.1 91% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB 29,586 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	MC Read 29.3 MC Write 27.7 MC Mixed 22.7 76% 26.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 23.2 SC Mixed 17.4 53% 18.5 GB/s	Latency 87.6 46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop 873-0xxx Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 85%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 78%

Battleship

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop 873-0xxx

CPU
Core i7-9700FIntel $279Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	30x
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	9x
Core i3-9100FIntel $115Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	2x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $271Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	17x
GTX 1660Nvidia $209Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	7x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	5x

SSD
SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GBIntelBench 147%, 27,018 samples	9x
hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG-8310A 512GBSKBench 131%, 6,904 samples	7x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-128G-1006 128GBWDCBench 121%, 4,055 samples	4x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	11x
M378A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 48%, 1,820 samples	8x
HMA82GU6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 48%, 5,791 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $550

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359