Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3110M-$70 34,445 User benchmarks, average bench 48% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	Memory 51.4 1-Core 55.6 2-Core 97.8 41% 68.3 Pts	4-Core 141 8-Core 144 19% 142 Pts	64-Core 144 9% 144 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sony(104D 90AB) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.73% Terrible	Lighting 3.4 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 2.5 3% 2.47 fps	MRender 3.7 Gravity 2 Splatting 3.8 3% 3.17 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.73% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
INTENSO 240GB 887 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0609A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 225 195 182 170 172 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	68% Good	Read 442 Write 388 Mixed 386 SusWrite 211 80% 357 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 51.1 4K Mixed 23.5 98% 33.7 MB/s	DQ Read 156 DQ Write 201 DQ Mixed 52.1 75% 137 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	21.9% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 7.7 22% 7.53 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 6.6 18% 6.27 GB/s	Latency 156 26% 156 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	8x
Core(TL) i3-3100MIntel(R(Bench 41%, 1 sample	1x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	9x

SSD
SKC600512G 512GBKingstonBench 109%, 5,390 samples	2x
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston $35Bench 67%, 80,916 samples	1x
INTENSO 240GBBench 77%, 887 samples	1x

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $70