| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 33.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Micro-Star MS-7C39 |
| Motherboard | MSI B365M PRO-VDH(MS-7C39) (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20200604 |
| Uptime | 4.4 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 24 '23 at 19:25 |
| Run Duration | 116 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 26% |
PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
58.5%
Above average
|
71% 118 Pts
|
29% 227 Pts
|
16% 266 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
31.5%
Below average
|
32% 41 fps
|
31% 38 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 226 334 334 344 331 MB/s
|
33.8%
Below average
|
52% 232 MB/s
|
22% 5.63 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BLE4G4D26AFEA.8FBD 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
36.9%
Below average
|
37% 12.9 GB/s
|
24% 8.27 GB/s
|
53% 75.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical B365M PRO-VDH(MS-7C39) Builds (Compare 3,775 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI B365M PRO-VDH(MS-7C39)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,309x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 498x |
| Core i5-9600KIntel $145Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 296x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $239Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 352x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 214x |
| RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 202x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Excellent | Total price: $439 |