Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PRO II

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B450M-PRO II  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '23 at 19:16
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$123
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 81.1
1-Core 162
2-Core 326
100% 189 Pts
4-Core 646
8-Core 932
99% 789 Pts
64-Core 1,098
68% 1,098 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 101%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
ASRock(1849 5111) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 142
Parallax 194
104% 155 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 146
Splatting 94.9
95% 119 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lenovo E660 SSD-2.5-512G 512GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0718B0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 483
Write 327
Mixed 375
88% 395 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 72.4
4K Mixed 0.3
85% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 88.9
DQ Write 5.6
DQ Mixed 0.2
12% 31.6 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 90%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
6GB free
Firmware: 03070103
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 480
Write 350
Mixed 325
85% 385 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 59
4K Mixed 34.8
119% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 116
95% 135 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
0GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 170
Write 146
Mixed 33.4
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.5
132% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 103%
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B0 320GB
1GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 69.7
Write 71.4
Mixed 43.6
46% 61.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Asgard VMA45UG-MEC1U2AW2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 41.1
MC Write 42.3
MC Mixed 34.9
113% 39.4 GB/s
SC Read 29.1
SC Write 43.9
SC Mixed 32.3
100% 35.1 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 109%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B450M-PRO II Builds (Compare 855 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PRO II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $213
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback