Lenovo 20AWS1XV00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemLenovo 20AWS1XV00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20AWS1XV00
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '23 at 14:38
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4800MQ-$150
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Memory 57.3
1-Core 75.5
2-Core 146
53% 93 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 394
39% 320 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 220E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.13% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 6.1
3% 3.77 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 5
4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.13%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 52 52 53 54 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 439
Write 409
Mixed 377
SusWrite 85.5
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 29.7
104% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 50.5
DQ Mixed 76.7
81% 140 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
39.9% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 12.1
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 13.2
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 136
30% 136 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20AWS1XV00 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20AWS1XV00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback