Lenovo 81W4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81W4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '23 at 13:43
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 42.2
1-Core 66.4
2-Core 176
49% 94.8 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 677
74% 584 Pts
64-Core 683
42% 683 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Legend(17AA 381C) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.28.10
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Lighting 14.5
Reflection 12.9
Parallax 19.1
12% 15.5 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 14.8
Splatting 16.3
12% 14 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFM512GDHTNI-87A0B 512GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11020C00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 884
Write 949
Mixed 865
201% 899 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 66.1
4K Mixed 45.9
148% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 770
DQ Write 666
DQ Mixed 534
450% 657 MB/s
Poor: 124% Great: 200%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
550GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 96 96 96 94 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 76.2
Write 59.8
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 95.6
55% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
148% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 8GB
2667, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
47.3% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 15.9
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 11.5
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 192
21% 192 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81W4 Builds (Compare 208 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81W4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback