Lenovo 80RQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 80RQ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SuperX 5B
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '23 at 13:38
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
56.4% Above average
Memory 70.8
1-Core 73
2-Core 159
58% 101 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 260
33% 250 Pts
64-Core 256
16% 256 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M
Legend(17AA 0006) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2849
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 22.2
Reflection 18
Parallax 20.6
18% 20.3 fps
MRender 24.1
Gravity 23
Splatting 16.6
17% 21.2 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 235 218 229 232 232 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 410
Write 378
Mixed 283
SusWrite 239
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 33.4
112% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 310
240% 331 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.2% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 18.1
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80RQ Builds (Compare 55 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80RQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback