Lenovo 30C2001KUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemLenovo 30C2001KUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 310C
Memory20.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220727
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '23 at 08:16
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 104
2-Core 192
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 533
53% 431 Pts
64-Core 542
34% 542 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia T1000 8GB
HP(103C 1612) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.49
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.3% Poor
Lighting 35.2
Reflection 40.7
Parallax 27.6
29% 34.5 fps
MRender 48.1
Gravity 32.3
Splatting 33.4
30% 37.9 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 39%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Thnsf5512gpuk TOSHIBA 512GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51055KLA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 296 385 373 197 245 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 998
Write 882
Mixed 562
SusWrite 324
154% 691 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 62
4K Mixed 43.8
119% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 711
DQ Write 486
DQ Mixed 577
437% 591 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 125%
Great: 163%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
76.1% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 25
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 19.5
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30C2001KUS Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 30C2001KUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback