Lenovo 90RJ00CTUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemLenovo 90RJ00CTUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3730
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '23 at 14:59
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User DOM-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$124
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 25.4
1-Core 114
2-Core 238
61% 126 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 724
72% 584 Pts
64-Core 941
58% 941 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 3730) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.2079
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
5.3% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 6.7
5% 6.8 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 9.9
6% 7.53 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.3%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ256HBJD-00BL1 256GB
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7L1QFXM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 861 889 911 640 162 155 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 892
Write 672
Mixed 660
SusWrite 603
158% 707 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 32.2
103% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 541
DQ Write 374
DQ Mixed 446
336% 454 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 125%
Great: 214%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMUA5200MR78HAF-3200 RMUA5190MR86H9F-3200 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
21.7% Poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 7.1
23% 8 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 4.6
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 283
14% 283 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90RJ00CTUS Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90RJ00CTUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $124
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback