Asus H110M-CS

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	57.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

16 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-CS (all builds)
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180507
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Feb 23 '23 at 14:36
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	LKA-User
Background CPU	29%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-7100-$38 79,299 User benchmarks, average bench 57% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	58.8% Above average	Memory 76.2 1-Core 98.9 2-Core 180 68% 118 Pts	4-Core 240 8-Core 250 32% 245 Pts	64-Core 257 16% 257 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 3739) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.49 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	57.9% Above average	Lighting 71.6 Reflection 111 Parallax 71.2 58% 84.6 fps	MRender 68.3 Gravity 73.2 Splatting 68.2 57% 69.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDS250G3B0A-00AXR0 250GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 172GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS2227I SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 317 314 412 385 222 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Read 402 Write 354 Mixed 279 SusWrite 298 75% 333 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 65.6 4K Mixed 8.7 84% 33.3 MB/s	DQ Read 171 DQ Write 264 DQ Mixed 13.8 68% 150 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 97%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 729GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 154 153 155 153 150 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	89.7% Excellent	Read 159 Write 149 Mixed 33.7 SusWrite 153 90% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata 1x8GB 25,310 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.3% Below average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 11.4 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 12.9 SC Mixed 11.3 34% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 87.9 46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-CS Builds (Compare 910 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-CS

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	248x
Core i3-7100Intel $38Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	145x
Core i3-6098PIntelBench 62%, 6,133 samples	94x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	128x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	116x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	108x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	58x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $56Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	39x
BX500 240GBCrucial $27Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	33x

RAM
1x4GBAdataBench 31%, 5,816 samples	34x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	27x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 46,470 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $157

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359