Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics90.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171204
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '23 at 14:27
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 73.4
1-Core 101
2-Core 196
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 585
56% 464 Pts
64-Core 760
47% 760 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.8% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 120
Parallax 0.1
93% 78.2 fps
MRender 87
Gravity 120
Splatting 107
86% 105 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 28 8.6 8.9 29 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 425
Write 247
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 47.6
44% 200 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 13.2
54% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 38.4
DQ Mixed 38.7
39% 64.7 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 55%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
45GB free
Firmware: 411040WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 258 257 259 259 259 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 462
Mixed 359
SusWrite 269
88% 394 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 42.7
144% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 255
216% 316 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 111%
Seagate Portable 1TB
711GB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 122 114 119 119 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 86.9
Write 94.3
Mixed 88.2
SusWrite 118
72% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.8
128% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D26BFSE.16FBD2 BLS8G4D26BFSE.16FD2 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
90.4% Outstanding
MC Read 35.4
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 32
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 27.8
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 93.8
43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,162 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback