Primux Primux_Device_W10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics91.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPrimux Primux_Device_W10  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME A320M-K
Memory20.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '23 at 13:55
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$99
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 68.1
1-Core 123
2-Core 228
77% 140 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 573
59% 475 Pts
64-Core 574
36% 574 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
Asus(1043 86F0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.3% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 105
Parallax 108
93% 109 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 102
Splatting 93.8
87% 109 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 97%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S750 1TB
647GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0508B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 4.9 121 212 333 434 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.9% Below average
Read 256
Write 173
Mixed 6
SusWrite 185
34% 155 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.2
39% 9.37 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA266.C8FJ GR2666D464L19/16G 24GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84.8% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 27.9
87% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 25.8
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Primux_Device_W10 Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Primux Primux_Device_W10

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $183
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback