Asrock H55M-LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock H55M-LE  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101020
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '23 at 09:44
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 530-$45
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 78
1-Core 83.6
2-Core 133
60% 98.2 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 195
24% 186 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 5530
PwrHis(1787 3001) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1002
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.11% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 1.8
1% 1.83 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.11%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$44
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 235 242 216 239 245 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
70.6% Very good
Read 236
Write 227
Mixed 199
SusWrite 234
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 52.8
4K Mixed 36.1
122% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 176
138% 191 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 128%
Hitachi HUS726040ALE614 4TB
142GB free
Firmware: APGNW907
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 129 126 126 128 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 180
Write 168
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 126
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.7
201% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
0, 0 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
32.1% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 11.5
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 8.9
24% 8.53 GB/s
Latency 84.3
47% 84.3 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H55M-LE Builds (Compare 342 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H55M-LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback