Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N3700 11,299 User benchmarks, average bench 26% CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	24.6% Poor	Memory 39.3 1-Core 20.9 2-Core 42.5 23% 34.2 Pts	4-Core 57.4 8-Core 63.4 8% 60.4 Pts	64-Core 61.4 4% 61.4 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 1018) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4352 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.57% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 0.8 Parallax 1.5 2% 1.43 fps	MRender 1.8 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 1.8 2% 1.77 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.57% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 127GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 263 303 244 326 303 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	62.9% Good	Read 387 Write 386 Mixed 328 SusWrite 274 77% 344 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 33.1 4K Mixed 25.9 84% 27.1 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 84 DQ Mixed 92.1 70% 95.4 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HX316LS9IB/8-sp 1x8GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.3% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 3.8 12% 4.17 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 2.7 9% 3.03 GB/s	Latency 205 20% 205 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 15%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium N3710IntelBench 25%, 12,685 samples	11x
Celeron N3050IntelBench 19%, 14,457 samples	9x
Pentium N3700IntelBench 26%, 11,299 samples	8x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	35x

RAM
ACR16D3LS1KNG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 23%, 5,526 samples	8x
ACR16D3LFS1KBG/2G 1x2GBKingstonBench 17%, 2,515 samples	4x
AO1L16BC4R1-BQSS 1x4GBAdataBench 20%, 3,685 samples	4x

Value: 25% - Poor

Total price: $94

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16