| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 29.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (86%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H61M-A (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140624 |
| Uptime | 6 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 23 '23 at 03:28 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | NZL-User |
| Background CPU | 86% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
64.5%
Good
|
70% 117 Pts
|
28% 200 Pts
|
12% 186 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.9%
Above average
|
54% 72.2 fps
|
49% 61.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 39 29 27 23 31 MB/s
|
29.4%
Poor
|
32% 142 MB/s
|
47% 15.3 MB/s
|
34% 58.8 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$45
122GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 127 128 126 121 125 MB/s
|
81.3%
Excellent
|
87% 121 MB/s
|
368% 2.8 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5471-035.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
51.3%
Above average
|
53% 18.6 GB/s
|
28% 9.93 GB/s
|
63% 63.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-A Builds (Compare 225 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H61M-A
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 37x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 30x |
| Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples | 22x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 39x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 23x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 11x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $87 |