HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory20.3 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '23 at 20:01
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 82.4
2-Core 158
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 489
50% 405 Pts
64-Core 1,047
65% 1,047 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Asus(1043 8561) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.5% Below average
Lighting 39.9
Reflection 43.2
Parallax 38.7
32% 40.6 fps
MRender 35.8
Gravity 38.9
Splatting 34.3
30% 36.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PLEXTOR PX-256M8 256GB
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.06 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 495 480 493 473 431 469 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 578
Write 488
Mixed 412
SusWrite 473
110% 488 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 30.1
99% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 453
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 343
266% 369 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 205%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT151R7BFR4C-G7 ID:80 AD HMT151R7BFR4C-G7 ID:80 AD HMT151R7BFR4C-G7 ID:80 AD HMT151R7BFR4C-G7 ID:80 AD HMT151R7BFR4C-G7 ID:80 AD HMT151R7BFR4C-G7 58GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
47.7% Average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 16.7
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 8.3
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback