Foxconn H55M-S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics81.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive53.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardFoxconn H55M-S  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110622
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '23 at 19:41
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3470
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 94
1-Core 80.5
2-Core 165
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 368
40% 316 Pts
64-Core 377
23% 377 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.5% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 106
Parallax 97.2
84% 102 fps
MRender 91
Gravity 95.8
Splatting 97.2
78% 94.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC600/256G 256GB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2227I
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 180 223 227 228 226 MB/s
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.7% Above average
Read 247
Write 234
Mixed 223
SusWrite 199
51% 226 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 54.9
4K Mixed 12.1
85% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 16.8
53% 113 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 88%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
336GB free
Firmware: SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 111 116 113 118 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 71.7
Write 64.4
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 111
56% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.5
180% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 71%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$40
434GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 87 92 90 91 92 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 93.6
Write 87.9
Mixed 49.4
SusWrite 87.7
58% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
51.3% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 16.9
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 14.4
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H55M-S Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn H55M-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $210
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback