Asus PRIME H310M-A R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-A R2.0  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '23 at 16:09
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 91.2
1-Core 117
2-Core 232
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 592
62% 494 Pts
64-Core 584
36% 584 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Asus(1043 883C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.49
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
108% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 146
Parallax 145
111% 143 fps
MRender 169
Gravity 121
Splatting 108
106% 132 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 108%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X210 128GB-$149
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X210400
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 397
Write 203
Mixed 122
53% 241 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 19.2
71% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 65.2
DQ Mixed 111
77% 96.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 97%
WD Black 2.5" 250GB (2010)-$55
203GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 82 86 86 87 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 80.3
Write 83.6
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 85.2
56% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905702-002.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
40.7% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 11.3
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 11.9
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H310M-A R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,536 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-A R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $342
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback