Alienware Aurora-R4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics78.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive59.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAlienware Aurora-R4  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 07JNH0
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131126
Uptime33.6 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '23 at 15:45
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 88.6
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 195
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 584
61% 489 Pts
64-Core 732
45% 732 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.1
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.1% Very good
Lighting 99.3
Reflection 107
Parallax 151
81% 119 fps
MRender 89.3
Gravity 107
Splatting 75.1
73% 90.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-256L9S-11 2.5 7mm 256GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HC8110B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 237 241 247 229 247 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.8% Above average
Read 250
Write 238
Mixed 202
SusWrite 237
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 24
90% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 127
108% 159 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 103%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
3TB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 154 155 155 152 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 158
Write 152
Mixed 68
SusWrite 153
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73BH0-CK0 M378B1G73DB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.3% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 17.6
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 11.6
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora-R4 Builds (Compare 1,707 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: Alienware Aurora-R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $415
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback