Acer Nitro N50-640

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Nitro N50-640  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Nitro N50-640
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220506
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '23 at 14:16
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 54.6
1-Core 134
2-Core 260
78% 150 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 787
77% 631 Pts
64-Core 1,003
62% 1,003 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AA1 512GB
448GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 393 386 259 224 268 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 886
Write 615
Mixed 785
SusWrite 324
146% 653 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 55.3
222% 92.4 MB/s
DQ Read 783
DQ Write 900
DQ Mixed 770
600% 817 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 160%
Great: 207%
UFD 3.0 Silicon-Power16G 16GB
10GB free, PID 0917
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 14 14 16 16 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 102
Write 16.2
Mixed 21.4
SusWrite 14.9
38% 38.7 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
35% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR32D4U2S1ME-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
36.2% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 10.9
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 8.4
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro N50-640 Builds (Compare 1,874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

System: Acer Nitro N50-640

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $363
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback