Lenovo 90SM0014AU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics5.72% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive303% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 90SM0014AU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 32E9
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220425
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '23 at 11:04
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 81.2
1-Core 196
2-Core 393
116% 224 Pts
4-Core 763
8-Core 1,363
128% 1,063 Pts
64-Core 2,216
137% 2,216 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 112%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Legend(17AA 32E9) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3729
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
5.72% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 10.4
5% 9.9 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 14.9
Splatting 4.1
8% 10.5 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.72%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZL 512GB
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: L01C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1461 1506 1516 1262 461 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
303% Outstanding
Read 2,381
Write 1465
Mixed 1,235
SusWrite 1,051
341% 1,533 MB/s
4K Read 67.7
4K Write 218
4K Mixed 97.6
343% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 451
DQ Write 1230
DQ Mixed 404
434% 695 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 303%
Great: 302%
Samsung 870 EVO 500G 500GB
395GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 363 358 354 360 362 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 382
Write 406
Mixed 380
SusWrite 364
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 40
4K Mixed 32.5
110% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 154
116% 154 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2G43AB3-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
46.8% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 14.2
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 16.3
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90SM0014AU Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 90SM0014AU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback