Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '23 at 00:58
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 61.8
2-Core 128
56% 91.3 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 356
37% 296 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.Q4
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Lighting 67.4
Reflection 65.6
Parallax 90.8
55% 74.6 fps
MRender 67.2
Gravity 76.6
Splatting 48.4
51% 64.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ST4000DX005-3GH101 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: FC01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 217 215 215 226 226 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 240
Write 227
Mixed 128
SusWrite 219
46% 203 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 18.8
4K Mixed 0.7
64% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 4
DQ Write 14.9
DQ Mixed 0.4
3% 6.43 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 45%
ST4000DX005-3GH101 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: FC01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 225 222 223 234 235 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 228
Write 180
Mixed 118
SusWrite 227
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 18.1
4K Mixed 1.1
62% 17.7 MB/s
DQ Read 4.6
DQ Write 10.2
DQ Mixed 0.7
2% 5.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 45%
ST4000DX005-3GH101 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: FC01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 200 193 197 205 204 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 219
Write 205
Mixed 108
SusWrite 198
41% 183 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 16.8
4K Mixed 1.1
58% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 4.4
DQ Write 25.7
DQ Mixed 0.7
5% 10.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 45%
WD WD450VF4YZ-79SJYM0 4.5TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 41 57 110 159 163 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 156
Write 164
Mixed 76.9
SusWrite 106
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
80% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.9% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 18.6
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 12.8
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,682 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $630
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback