HP 340 G2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 340 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 8036
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160406
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '23 at 16:51
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 3205U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Memory 24.6
1-Core 17.9
2-Core 36.8
16% 26.4 Pts
4-Core 39
8-Core 45.7
6% 42.3 Pts
64-Core 28.4
2% 28.4 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
HP(103C 8036) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
2.26% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 3
2% 2.3 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 5.5
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.26%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SB8W128G1122 128GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6107000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 106 109 109 106 110 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.3% Below average
Read 221
Write 150
Mixed 128
SusWrite 109
34% 152 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 20.6
4K Mixed 14.8
47% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 74
DQ Mixed 66.4
56% 80.8 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
15% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 5.2
15% 5.13 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.8
14% 4.93 GB/s
Latency 288
14% 288 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 15%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 340 G2 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 340 G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback