Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics72.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DU
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '23 at 05:05
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
49.9% Average
Memory 46.3
1-Core 102
2-Core 196
61% 115 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 526
49% 406 Pts
64-Core 525
32% 525 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Asus(1043 10AF) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Lighting 92.5
Reflection 96.3
Parallax 83.2
75% 90.7 fps
MRender 93.5
Gravity 83.3
Splatting 76.3
68% 84.4 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SHGP31-1000GM 1TB
278GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41062C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1282 1494 1569 1407 965 942 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 1,901
Write 1,888
Mixed 1,465
SusWrite 1,276
367% 1,632 MB/s
4K Read 47.8
4K Write 90.2
4K Mixed 59.3
196% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 772
DQ Write 454
DQ Mixed 590
445% 605 MB/s
Poor: 173%
This bench: 242%
Great: 433%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK CT8G4SFS8266.M8FD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.7% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 21.6
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 175
23% 175 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU Builds (Compare 550 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback