Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	UMAX Visionbook 14Wr Plus (all builds)
Motherboard	To Visionbook 14Wr Plus
Memory	1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210220
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Feb 20 '23 at 22:50
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4120 2,420 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	24.5% Poor	Memory 23.9 1-Core 54.8 2-Core 97.3 31% 58.7 Pts	4-Core 148 8-Core 127 19% 138 Pts	64-Core 134 8% 134 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0100 2782) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.58% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 0.9 Parallax 1.9 2% 1.53 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 2.4 2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.58% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Verbatim Vi560 S3 256GB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 212GB free Firmware: U1013A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 242 324 322 330 361 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Read 310 Write 325 Mixed 325 SusWrite 315 72% 319 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 60.5 4K Mixed 16.8 91% 34 MB/s	DQ Read 177 DQ Write 174 DQ Mixed 34.9 65% 129 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 1x4GB 288 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	17.4% Very poor	MC Read 6.1 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 6.3 19% 6.5 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 4.3 10% 3.6 GB/s	Latency 293 14% 293 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 25%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4120IntelBench 33%, 2,420 samples	3x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	3x

SSD
860 EVO M.2 250GBSamsungBench 100%, 26,055 samples	1x
SA400M8240G 240GBKingstonBench 70%, 27,523 samples	1x
Vi560 S3 256GBVerbatimBench 70%, 58 samples	1x

RAM
123456789012345678 1x4GBABCDBench 15%, 288 samples	2x
123456789012345678 2x2GBABCDBench 19%, 5,404 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16