Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (1st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 99 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	12.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (95%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

14 months ago, 14 months ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 520-$70 23,644 User benchmarks, average bench 40% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	17.2% Very poor	Memory 22.5 1-Core 20.2 2-Core 34.1 16% 25.6 Pts	4-Core 66.7 8-Core 83.3 10% 75 Pts	64-Core 71.1 4% 71.1 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 47%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253X2256G 256GB 4,105 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 212GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 86 84 74 84 73 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	12.9% Very poor	Read 66.7 Write 52.9 Mixed 33.4 SusWrite 80.5 13% 58.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 6.1 16% 5.23 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-G7 2x2GB 519 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	13.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.5 MC Write 4.3 MC Mixed 6.1 14% 4.97 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 1.7 SC Mixed 2.6 6% 2.17 GB/s	Latency 303 13% 303 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16