Hp-pavilion NY556AA-ABL e9260f

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHp-pavilion NY556AA-ABL e9260f  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI Indio
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090911
Uptime1 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '23 at 18:07
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 87.3
1-Core 69.1
2-Core 131
60% 95.8 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 119
22% 152 Pts
64-Core 176
11% 176 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
PNY(196E 0997) 1GB
CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 473.81
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Lighting 15.4
Reflection 16.2
Parallax 20.5
13% 17.4 fps
MRender 20.5
Gravity 20.3
Splatting 15.7
15% 18.8 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
564GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 84 75 78 81 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 68.4
Write 90.1
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 80.4
54% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 2.4
404% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
CD04CD04 F3 DDR3 1333 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM SDRAM 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
36.1% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 12.2
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 9.2
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NY556AA-ABL e9260f Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Hp-pavilion NY556AA-ABL e9260f

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $224
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback