Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G3900T 150 User benchmarks, average bench 51% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	41.7% Average	Memory 70.9 1-Core 72.9 2-Core 74.1 48% 72.6 Pts	4-Core 71 8-Core 124 12% 97.5 Pts	64-Core 118 7% 118 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 510 (Desktop Skylake) 16,316 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 30D2) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6472 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.56% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 3.7 Parallax 2.9 2% 3.07 fps	MRender 4.8 Gravity 2.7 Splatting 4.8 3% 4.1 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.56% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500M8240G 240GB 3,393 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 187GB free (System drive) Firmware: 003056RR SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 110 113 101 107 116 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Read 404 Write 339 Mixed 336 SusWrite 126 67% 302 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 33.8 4K Mixed 18.9 78% 25.6 MB/s	DQ Read 143 DQ Write 135 DQ Mixed 119 95% 132 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT8G4SFRA266.C8FP Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	62.3% Good	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 27.9 MC Mixed 21.5 67% 23.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 17.7 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 99.3 40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 64%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron G3900TIntelBench 51%, 150 samples	17x

GPU
HD 510 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 3%, 16,316 samples	17x

SSD
SUV500M8240G 240GBKingstonBench 75%, 3,393 samples	10x
HG6 128GBToshibaBench 79%, 5,641 samples	6x

RAM
M471A1K43BB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 35%, 32,056 samples	9x
CT16G4SFRA266.M8FF 1x16GBCrucialBench 37%, 37 samples	4x
CT8G4SFRA266.C8FP Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 16GBUnknownBench 57%, 3 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16