QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 154%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory47.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 47.5GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory29.8 GB free of 47.5 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '23 at 18:32
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 15 cores, 30 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 85.1
1-Core 169
2-Core 327
104% 194 Pts
4-Core 652
8-Core 1,281
114% 966 Pts
64-Core 2,690
166% 2,690 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 165
Parallax 171
136% 168 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 134
Splatting 115
113% 142 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 123%
Great: 136%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1890 1934 1915 1926 1944 1953 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 1,967
Write 2141
Mixed 2,058
SusWrite 1,927
457% 2,023 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 38
4K Mixed 33.4
108% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 133
100% 134 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 236%
Great: 488%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 47GB
0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 16384, 15872 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
134% Outstanding
MC Read 77.4
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 38.9
146% 51.3 GB/s
SC Read 28.8
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 36.6
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 134%
Great: 178%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback