Vizio CT14-A4

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Vizio CT14-A4 (all builds)
Motherboard	Quanta VZ1
Memory	1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120920
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 19 '23 at 18:02
Run Duration	191 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225 26,848 User benchmarks, average bench 47% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	42.7% Average	Memory 62.7 1-Core 54.9 2-Core 106 45% 74.7 Pts	4-Core 133 8-Core 135 18% 134 Pts	64-Core 155 10% 155 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Quanta(152D 0922) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.75% Terrible	Lighting 3.4 Reflection 1.6 Parallax 2.5 3% 2.5 fps	MRender 3.7 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 3.9 3% 3.23 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.75% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNW128GMCP 128GB 95 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: L0913A SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 112 104 109 103 123 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	26.9% Poor	Read 223 Write 98.9 Mixed 160 SusWrite 112 33% 149 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 6.8 4K Mixed 8.8 37% 10 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 32%
Adata SU 650 120GB 342 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 112GB free Firmware: V8X0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 40.3 Write 40.8 Mixed 40.1 SusWrite 11.8 7% 33.2 MB/s	DQ Read 24.1 DQ Write 20.2 DQ Mixed 22.1 17% 22.1 MB/s	4K Write 8.9 4K Mixed 10.3 27% 9.6 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 82%
Jmicron Generic 128GB 114 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 119GB free Firmware: 0215 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Read 27.4 Write 40.9 Mixed 19.2 SusWrite 11.9 18% 24.9 MB/s	4K Read 7.8 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 5.9 1,073% 6.23 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 24%
ASolid USB 64GB 185 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 58GB free, PID 205a Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 7.8 8.6 7.6 8.6 7.8 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 8% Great: 35%
Initio Ini-3910 128GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 118% 119GB free, PID 3910 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 11 11 12 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 42.3 Write 36.6 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 11.5 41% 31.5 MB/s	DQ Read 11.2 DQ Write 18.2 DQ Mixed 13.7 1,127% 14.4 MB/s	4K Write 9.8 4K Mixed 11.7 1,097% 10.8 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 170%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida 2x2GB 4,273 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	MC Read 11.5 MC Write 11.2 MC Mixed 10.7 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 10.5 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 120 33% 120 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CT14-A4 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Vizio CT14-A4

CPU
Core i5-3317UIntel $225Bench 47%, 26,848 samples	4x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	4x

SSD
THNSNW128GMCP 128GBToshibaBench 28%, 95 samples	4x

RAM
2x2GBElpidaBench 44%, 4,273 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $225

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16