Emaxx EMX-IH61LE-iCafe

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardEmaxx EMX-IH61LE-iCafe  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110714
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '23 at 14:40
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Memory 84.7
1-Core 75.2
2-Core 123
59% 94.4 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 172
22% 168 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Nvidia(10DE 118B) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 474.14
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.35% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 4.2
3% 4.03 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.35%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ramsta S800 128GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RY2NV0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 64 43 41 29 43 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.7% Poor
Read 212
Write 195
Mixed 133
SusWrite 64.3
34% 151 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 9.8
44% 11.8 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS721050DLE630 500GB
224GB free
Firmware: MS1OA610
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 127 116 131 130 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 90.7
Write 104
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 126
62% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273EB0-CK0 RMR5030KD68F9F1600 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.4% Average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 13.3
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 12.2
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EMX-IH61LE-iCafe Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Emaxx EMX-IH61LE-iCafe

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback