Asus PRIME B450M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics59% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME B450M-A  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '23 at 12:13
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$168
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 75.5
1-Core 173
2-Core 341
103% 196 Pts
4-Core 682
8-Core 1,144
111% 913 Pts
64-Core 1,358
84% 1,358 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 101%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59% Above average
Lighting 76.3
Reflection 78.6
Parallax 74.5
62% 76.5 fps
MRender 63.2
Gravity 71.7
Splatting 60.5
53% 65.1 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS3030 250GB SSD
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS303320
SusWrite @10s intervals: 645 260 275 272 258 168 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,552
Write 1,197
Mixed 1,270
SusWrite 313
242% 1,083 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 195
4K Mixed 76.8
272% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 760
DQ Write 1,122
DQ Mixed 799
644% 894 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 207%
Great: 214%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35
62GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 66 66 66 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 57.3
Write 62.2
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 65.8
42% 57.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 50%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35
139GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 24,101
Mixed 63.8
8,634% 12,082 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 50%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
217GB free
Firmware: AX1P4M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 65 64 64 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 55.9
Write 66.6
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 64.4
39% 53.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 57%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
69GB free
Firmware: AX1P4M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 72 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 59.1
Write 70.3
Mixed 29
SusWrite 72.4
42% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 62%
ASMT 2115 320GB
294GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 114
Write 112
Mixed 54.1
114% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 45%
ASMT 2115 750GB
310GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 75 74 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 68
Write 72.7
Mixed 47.4
SusWrite 74.9
90% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
36% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 45%
ASMT 2115 750GB
131GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 61 60 61 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
24.6% Poor
Read 54.6
Write 58.8
Mixed 37.7
SusWrite 60.4
72% 52.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2133 C15 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.4% Good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 26.9
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 28.8
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B450M-A Builds (Compare 10,551 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B450M-A - $78

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $362
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback