Acer Aspire E5-475G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.84% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire E5-475G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer AntMan_SK
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '23 at 11:11
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Memory 67.8
1-Core 78.9
2-Core 138
56% 95 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 227
28% 217 Pts
64-Core 217
13% 217 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia 940MX
Acer(1025 110F) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2849
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
9.84% Terrible
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 11
Parallax 11.5
10% 11.7 fps
MRender 9.8
Gravity 13.8
Splatting 9.3
9% 11 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.84%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 74 2.3 2.1 18 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 349
Write 272
Mixed 180
SusWrite 67
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 22.7
4K Mixed 10.2
45% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 68
DQ Mixed 28.2
38% 70.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 55%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
259GB free
Firmware: AX1P5J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 54 53 54 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 62.8
Write 70.6
Mixed 30
SusWrite 53.9
40% 54.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AM1P24HC4U1-B9RS Samsung M471A5143DB0-CRC 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.1% Good
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 19.9
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 15.4
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-475G Builds (Compare 589 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-475G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback