ADD TO PC
BUILD

Medion E7222

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	15% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Medion E7222 (all builds)
Motherboard	Medion E7222
Memory	2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120413
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 16 '14 at 15:30
Run Duration	112 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2370M-$272 10,169 User benchmarks, average bench 49% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 60.6 2-Core 104 38% 82.3 Pts	4-Core 177 8-Core 176 24% 176 Pts	64-Core 178 11% 178 Pts
Poor: 33% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(1B0A 20C5) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.3517 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.85% Terrible	Lighting 2.07 Reflection 2.69 Parallax 1.38 2% 2.04 fps	MRender 2.29 Gravity 1.17 Splatting 4 2% 2.48 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.85% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 64GB 63GB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: L041 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 828 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 3 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1069 (F1) Unknown 100 100 110514 (F2) Unknown 100 100 150319 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 116 (A3) Unknown 100 100 20 (A4) Unknown 100 100 80120 (A5) Unknown 100 100 205 (A6) Unknown 100 100 103 (A7) Unknown 100 100 142	15% Very poor	Read 133 Write 68.9 Mixed 91.1 22% 97.7 MB/s	4K Read 9.01 4K Write 5.82 4K Mixed 2.11 19% 5.65 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 26%
Seagate ST9750423AS 750GB-$74 3,332 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 528GB free Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 113 99 56168192 (03) Spinup time 98 98 0 (04) Start/Stop count 37 37 65535 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 73 60 21508218 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 2341 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1074 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 52 538312736 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 4 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 93 93 15893 (C2) HDA temperature 32 48 73014444064 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 113 99 56168192 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 17480516895841 (F1) Unknown 100 253 4280867563 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2383604753 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	47.5% Average	Read 79.8 Write 85.9 Mixed 75 60% 80.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 0.99 4K Mixed 0.18 56% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical E7222 Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Medion E7222

CPU
Core i3-2370MIntel $272Bench 49%, 10,169 samples	23x
Core i3-2350MIntelBench 47%, 24,896 samples	9x
Core i7-2640MIntelBench 54%, 12,152 samples	3x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	32x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	3x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	3x

SSD
SSD 240GBIntensoBench 74%, 1,366 samples	4x
TS128GSSD340K 128GBTranscendBench 72%, 245 samples	2x
840 120GBSamsung $109Bench 61%, 51,792 samples	1x

RAM
HMT451S6MFR8C-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 26%, 294 samples	19x
F3-12800CL11-4GBSQ Hynix HMT451S6MFR8C-H9 8GBUnknownBench 37%, 5 samples	5x
M471B5273CH0-CF8 Hynix HMT451S6MFR8C-H9 8GBSamsungBench 39%, 4 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $272

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback