Lenovo 80T3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 80T3  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190509
Uptime22.7 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '23 at 03:37
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
57.2% Above average
Memory 76.2
1-Core 95.7
2-Core 160
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 232
30% 226 Pts
64-Core 225
14% 225 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 2112) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.5127
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.65% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 4.8
4% 6.47 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 7.4
5% 5.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.65%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 108 124 125 127 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 418
Write 126
Mixed 148
SusWrite 118
44% 202 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 15.2
90% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 120
119% 197 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
365GB free
Firmware: SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 85 93 92 91 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 80
Write 132
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 90.3
68% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
103% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown B0-CRC Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.7% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 16.3
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 16.9
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 87.8
46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80T3 Builds (Compare 282 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80T3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback