HP ProDesk 400 G3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G3  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82A5
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '23 at 09:30
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 82
1-Core 63.5
2-Core 142
58% 95.7 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 216
29% 219 Pts
64-Core 214
13% 214 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 82A5) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
5.44% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 4
Parallax 6.5
5% 5.5 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 10
6% 7.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.44%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SBAT-128G-1006 128GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2311006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 159 162 173 171 170 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 361
Write 148
Mixed 143
SusWrite 160
45% 203 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 59
4K Mixed 9.3
67% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 77.1
82% 134 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC M471A5143EB0-CPB 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.4% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 17.9
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 14.9
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G3 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback