Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-6410 APU R5 Graphics 19,683 User benchmarks, average bench 32% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	26.5% Poor	Memory 35.8 1-Core 32.3 2-Core 58.8 26% 42.3 Pts	4-Core 99.1 8-Core 104 14% 102 Pts	64-Core 97.7 6% 97.7 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 40,685 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 2B29) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	2.22% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 4.3 Parallax 3.7 2% 3.47 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 4.4 3% 3.17 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.22% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB 15,567 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 143 68 71 72 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	40.8% Average	Read 336 Write 211 Mixed 218 SusWrite 115 49% 220 MB/s	4K Read 10.7 4K Write 15.9 4K Mixed 12.5 41% 13 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 161 DQ Mixed 142 115% 162 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 1x8GB 7,988 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	16.4% Very poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 6.3 17% 5.8 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 5 12% 4.13 GB/s	Latency 223 18% 223 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 35%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
A8-6410 APU R5 GraphicsAMDBench 32%, 19,683 samples	4x

GPU
Radeon R5AMDBench 2%, 40,685 samples	4x

SSD
Burst 120GBPatriotBench 66%, 15,567 samples	1x

RAM
HMT425U6CFR6A-PB HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 6GBHynixBench 38%, 174 samples	1x
HMT425U6AFR6A-PB HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 6GBHynixBench 40%, 88 samples	1x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 1x8GBCrucialBench 30%, 7,988 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16