PC NH5x_7xDPx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemPC NH5x_7xDPx  (all builds)
MotherboardClevo NHxxDPx
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '23 at 23:48
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10870H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Memory 94.1
1-Core 129
2-Core 239
88% 154 Pts
4-Core 499
8-Core 935
86% 717 Pts
64-Core 1,227
76% 1,227 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 50F3) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.53% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 9.6
Parallax 8.4
6% 8.33 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 11.3
8% 9.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.53%
Great: 6%
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 50F3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3700 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 114
Parallax 119
112% 124 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 91
Splatting 75.7
82% 104 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 102%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme 256GB PCS PCIe M 256GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,593
Write 1,052
Mixed 969
266% 1,205 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 27.8
158% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 754
DQ Write 664
DQ Mixed 468
417% 629 MB/s
Poor: 90% Great: 164%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
698GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 479 464 410 460 477 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 483
Mixed 444
SusWrite 462
107% 475 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 89.7
4K Mixed 50.5
167% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 352
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 117%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GF2666C18S2 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
80% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 22.5
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 26.1
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 59.6
67% 59.6 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NH5x_7xDPx Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship

System: PC NH5x_7xDPx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $104
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback