Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G6900 184 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	49.9% Average	Memory 60.2 1-Core 140 2-Core 180 72% 127 Pts	4-Core 229 8-Core 238 31% 234 Pts	64-Core 180 11% 180 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 11 User benchmarks, average bench 4% MSI(1462 7D56) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.100.9837 Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	2.93% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 7.1 Parallax 5.2 3% 5.43 fps	MRender 5.4 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 2.9 2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.93% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HBJD-00B 256GB 710 User benchmarks, average bench 152% 211GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXM7AK1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 949 1052 564 770 191 156 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	160% Outstanding	Read 1062 Write 928 Mixed 995 SusWrite 614 202% 900 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 43.4 167% 64.2 MB/s	DQ Read 624 DQ Write 660 DQ Mixed 602 464% 629 MB/s
Poor: 100% ↑ This bench: 160% Great: 196%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M323R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 1x8GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	61.3% Good	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 24.2 MC Mixed 22.1 62% 21.6 GB/s	SC Read 18.1 SC Write 24.2 SC Mixed 22.1 61% 21.5 GB/s	Latency 127 32% 127 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 78%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 172%

UFO

GPU
RTX 4070Nvidia $549Bench 190%, 45,585 samples	3x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	1x
RTX 2060Nvidia $271Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	1x

SSD
Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBWDBench 217%, 23,579 samples	2x
MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 512GBSamsungBench 310%, 6,250 samples	1x
850 Pro 512GBSamsung $182Bench 102%, 68,849 samples	1x

RAM
M323R2GA3BB0-CQKOL 2x16GBSamsungBench 143%, 1,142 samples	3x
M323R2GA3BB0-CQKOL 1x16GBSamsungBench 74%, 230 samples	2x
M323R4GA3BB0-CQKOL 1x31GBSamsungBench 79%, 92 samples	1x

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $659