Lenovo 81LB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81LB  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201130
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '23 at 11:08
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 84%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 81.6
1-Core 88.2
2-Core 106
59% 91.8 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 268
29% 229 Pts
64-Core 143
9% 143 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 39F5) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
4.11% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 71.2
Parallax 6.2
4% 27.6 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 7.7
Splatting 0.1
4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.11%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid WDC WDS500G2B0C- 500GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 244 276 295 222 251 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 249%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
365GB free
Firmware: LXM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 6.4 5.9 5.7 8.2 6.5 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.45% Terrible
Read 2
Write 7.2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 6.5
4% 4.97 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 2.45%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS8266.M8FE Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
57.3% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 19.3
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 16.3
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81LB Builds (Compare 943 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 81LB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback