Dell Inspiron 24-5459

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive77.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Inspiron 24-5459  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0WCWFJ
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '23 at 08:04
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Memory 72.7
1-Core 76.8
2-Core 139
57% 96.1 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 253
32% 244 Pts
64-Core 256
16% 256 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 68%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IRP-SSDPR-S25C-512 512GB
395GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SCFM13.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 301 305 305 300 297 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 425
Write 402
Mixed 321
SusWrite 303
82% 363 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 53.3
4K Mixed 23.9
90% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 251
210% 303 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 135%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
760GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 110 111 110 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 118
Write 111
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 110
72% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IR1600S3V64L11/8G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
52.1% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 17.4
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 17
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 95.3
42% 95.3 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Inspiron 24-5459 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Dell Inspiron 24-5459

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback