Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4105 1,216 User benchmarks, average bench 36% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	Memory 45.8 1-Core 52 2-Core 104 39% 67.2 Pts	4-Core 168 8-Core 184 23% 176 Pts	64-Core 178 11% 178 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6813 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.02% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 2.5 2% 2.17 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 3.5 2% 2.93 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.02% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
256gb SSD 256GB 916 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 206GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN11842 SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 348 368 364 395 387 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Read 410 Write 231 Mixed 228 SusWrite 354 68% 306 MB/s	4K Read 15 4K Write 51.9 4K Mixed 28.8 87% 31.9 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 195 142% 184 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 167%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown AZ8G4SW266-8G 1x8GB 105 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	21.9% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 8.5 23% 8.2 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 3.4 10% 3.6 GB/s	Latency 177 23% 177 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 35%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J3455IntelBench 26%, 375 samples	30x
Celeron J4105IntelBench 36%, 1,216 samples	9x
Pentium J4205IntelBench 33%, 1,095 samples	8x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	23x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	9x
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	9x

RAM
1x8GBUndeBench 23%, 73 samples	38x
DDR4 NB 8G 2400 1x8GBUnknownBench 26%, 139 samples	7x
AZ8G4SW266-8G 1x8GBUnknownBench 27%, 105 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16