Lenovo 90N900EMMW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics73.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive173% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 90N900EMMW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 370A
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '23 at 22:35
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 93.2
1-Core 120
2-Core 246
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 762
74% 606 Pts
64-Core 860
53% 860 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
MSI(1462 3797) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.52
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.1% Very good
Lighting 91.4
Reflection 91.1
Parallax 82.9
74% 88.5 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 80.1
Splatting 72.7
70% 88.2 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Umis RPJTJ512MEE1OWX 512GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.2Q0628
SusWrite @10s intervals: 583 311 315 318 317 317 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 1,433
Write 975
Mixed 950
SusWrite 360
207% 929 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 57.3
200% 72.5 MB/s
DQ Read 748
DQ Write 683
DQ Mixed 309
343% 580 MB/s
Poor: 121%
This bench: 173%
Great: 210%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
287GB free, PID b207
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 110 110 110 110 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 129
Write 136
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 110
128% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
38% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C17D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.9% Very good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 21.6
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 23.1
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 61.6
65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90N900EMMW Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

System: Lenovo 90N900EMMW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback