Wortmann_ag TERRA_MOBILE_1513S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemWortmann_ag TERRA_MOBILE_1513S  (all builds)
MotherboardClevo W950JU
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160923
Uptime91.1 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '23 at 14:29
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
47.3% Average
Memory 68.9
1-Core 60.8
2-Core 106
49% 78.6 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 153
20% 152 Pts
64-Core 141
9% 141 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Clevo(1558 0941) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4678
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
4.81% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 5.4
4% 4.53 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 9.1
6% 6.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.81%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SBBU240G1122 240GB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3106000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 87 83 39 96 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 195
Write 343
Mixed 242
SusWrite 78.9
49% 215 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 34.7
4K Mixed 10
45% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 90.9
DQ Mixed 22
43% 87.7 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325S6EFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
38.1% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 12.5
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 11.1
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TERRA_MOBILE_1513S Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Wortmann_ag TERRA_MOBILE_1513S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback