RM ONE 300

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemRM ONE 300  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ57TM
Memory3 GB free of 5 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '23 at 22:58
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 88.9
1-Core 76.5
2-Core 139
63% 102 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 230
28% 217 Pts
64-Core 230
14% 230 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
Gigabyte(1458 255C) 2GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Lighting 22.9
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 30.5
19% 28.4 fps
MRender 26.1
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 21.4
19% 23.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 80GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2CV102M3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 64 77 78 72 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
32% Below average
Read 214
Write 79.3
Mixed 106
SusWrite 73.6
26% 118 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 43.1
4K Mixed 10.7
61% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 17.5
DQ Write 34.3
DQ Mixed 12
13% 21.3 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32%
Great: 44%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$20
149GB free
Firmware: 02.03E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 97 100 101 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 100
Write 98.8
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 98.7
66% 90.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG M2Y2G64CB8HC5N-CG Kingston 99U5474-001.A00LF 5GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.3% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 13.3
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 10.7
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ONE 300 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: RM ONE 300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $432
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback