HP ProBook 650 G1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ProBook 650 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1993
Memory5.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150325
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '23 at 21:17
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 80%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Memory 7.29
1-Core 51.8
2-Core 74.7
23% 44.6 Pts
4-Core 91.4
8-Core 88.9
12% 90.2 Pts
64-Core 102
6% 102 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
HP(103C 1993) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
2.56% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 4.9
2% 3.37 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 4
3% 3.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.56%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
626GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 160 227 245 260 188 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.9% Average
Read 235
Write 135
Mixed 236
SusWrite 221
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 27
4K Mixed 18.5
60% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 89.4
DQ Mixed 141
110% 155 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 1315 CT102464BF160B.M16 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
19.5% Very poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.7 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 2.9
9% 3.13 GB/s
Latency 430
9% 430 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 650 G1 Builds (Compare 226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 650 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback